The factory has to install an approved device or assembly for any high hazard connection.....this case is were a potable water supply is hooked to piping that can have contact with sewage. If a backflow situation were to happen, that black tank sewage can contaminate drinking water. A single check valve is not an approved device, so a vacumn breaker was used.I have gone through three of these in the last six months. Each failure has resulted in wet carpet in the basement. I would prefer not to go through this again. Is it ok to replace the vacuum breaker with a normal check valve? If not, why not?
Thank you for your valued responses. For those suggesting I need a pressure regulator, I have had one on the flush inlet from day 1.
Cheers
Presumably they know about check valves but call for a vacuum breaker.When installing listed permanent in-tank sprayingdevices, be sure to use the provided vacuum breaker on the supply line to prevent cross
connections between the fresh and waste water systems. With the potable water and waste
water being in direct contact, if a change of potable water pressure occurred in the system,
without a vacuum breaker, waste water could be drawn into the potable water system, creating
an eminent safety hazard.
I'm thinking my situation is similar to what you had. My black tank flush line comes in through plastic hose connector in UDC, connects directly to PEX run going up behind the shower to what I assume is anti-siphon valve, then back down to the tank. Whenever I used it, I would have some small amount of water run back down the outside pex line toward the UDC. I think what you described is what I've been pondering - replace the plastic hose connector with a brass backflow preventer, run the PEX directly across under the floor to the tank. I thought I might even add a Sharkbite inline check valve on that end. Do I have the correct understanding of your modification?
I can't help but wonder why the factory would use 12-15 ft with an ASV versus an 8 ft run with real backflow protection. Any thoughts? Until I found your post, it's what has kept me from just doing this mod. Thank you for posting. (I love this forum.)
Out of curiosity, while brass would for sure be better than the plastic PoS, why would the ASV be preferable to just running a line across with the check valves? I guess check valves can fail but so can ASVs, right?Sounds like you understand what I did. If your line runs behind the shower, you may be able to access the ASV through the port under the shower controls (assuming there is one). If so, they do make real ones made of brass that you could replace it with. With mine, I would have had to rip a hole in the wall.
I used the Sharkbite check valve to join the lines after cutting the broken plastic ASV off.
If RVIA really gave a crap, they’d specify a brass ASV instead of some poorly molded plastic PoS and insist it be installed so it’s accessible by the consumer.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
As I had mentioned in post #3, the factory has to install an approved assembly or device when sewage and potable water is able to be cross connected. A one way valve is not such a unit by code.Out of curiosity, while brass would for sure be better than the plastic PoS, why would the ASV be preferable to just running a line across with the check valves? I guess check valves can fail but so can ASVs, right?
Thanks John