danemayer
Well-known member
I got my Class A in Texas before picking up our Rushmore. California and a few other states have stricter requirements than Texas and most others. I didn't want to worry about license issues and also wanted some driving practice since the longest trailer I'd ever towed was for a 13' boat, and that was quite a long time ago.
http://austincdlservices.com/ to the rescue. Eddie Torres found out that he could make more money with his truck by helping people get Class A licenses than by hauling stuff. You get unlimited time with his tractor trailer to learn how to drive the actual test route successfully, back up, parallel park, demonstrate the air brakes, etc. He'll tell you when you're ready for the test and will keep going until you pass if more than one road test is needed. He's there every day and all the examiners know him and know what to expect from his students.
Most of Eddie's students are there so they can get a job, and $1000 or so is a pretty good deal. While I was there, a guy from California showed up. Spent a couple of hours per day practicing for 3 days, took his test and passed. He was issued a Texas Class A CDL and then went home and traded it in for a California license without any testing in California. He said that even with the travel, it was way less expensive than schools in California.
In 2010 Eddie charged $800 for the road test plus $200 for the written test answers. I declined the written part and made my own study guide from the Texas books. I see that his prices have gone up some, but for anyone interested, I'd suggest negotiating.
By the way, in Texas, the exams and road tests for Class A CDL and Class A non-commercial are the same. There's a difference in the application fee - I think the CDL cost $60 for 6 years vs $24 for the non-commercial. I splurged on the CDL.
On a side note, all the state employees in Texas are very confused about requirements for RVs. The booklets, forms and websites use ambiguous and confusing language. When I started looking into what was required, I got many different "official" answers; mostly that I would need at least a non-commercial Class A. When I finally tracked down the actual statute, the language was crystal clear in exempting drivers of personal use RVs from needing higher class licenses. All of the derivative documents from the DMV made it sound otherwise. Unfortunately for Californians, the language is pretty clear - in the other direction.
http://austincdlservices.com/ to the rescue. Eddie Torres found out that he could make more money with his truck by helping people get Class A licenses than by hauling stuff. You get unlimited time with his tractor trailer to learn how to drive the actual test route successfully, back up, parallel park, demonstrate the air brakes, etc. He'll tell you when you're ready for the test and will keep going until you pass if more than one road test is needed. He's there every day and all the examiners know him and know what to expect from his students.
Most of Eddie's students are there so they can get a job, and $1000 or so is a pretty good deal. While I was there, a guy from California showed up. Spent a couple of hours per day practicing for 3 days, took his test and passed. He was issued a Texas Class A CDL and then went home and traded it in for a California license without any testing in California. He said that even with the travel, it was way less expensive than schools in California.
In 2010 Eddie charged $800 for the road test plus $200 for the written test answers. I declined the written part and made my own study guide from the Texas books. I see that his prices have gone up some, but for anyone interested, I'd suggest negotiating.
By the way, in Texas, the exams and road tests for Class A CDL and Class A non-commercial are the same. There's a difference in the application fee - I think the CDL cost $60 for 6 years vs $24 for the non-commercial. I splurged on the CDL.
On a side note, all the state employees in Texas are very confused about requirements for RVs. The booklets, forms and websites use ambiguous and confusing language. When I started looking into what was required, I got many different "official" answers; mostly that I would need at least a non-commercial Class A. When I finally tracked down the actual statute, the language was crystal clear in exempting drivers of personal use RVs from needing higher class licenses. All of the derivative documents from the DMV made it sound otherwise. Unfortunately for Californians, the language is pretty clear - in the other direction.