Feedback requested on Two Bighorn Front Cap Concepts

[Bones]

Why does one concept have three markers and the other one doesn't. Just like the first set of pictures

 

[kowAlski631]

Concept 4 is our new favorite.

 

[Bogie]

I voted for number 2.

I don't like the squared off top of number 1 or the large lettering. The graphic on number 1 could work on number 2 s well if it were a bit smaller.

Concetpt 4 is pretty nice too. Still like the rounded top.!

 

[Capt7383]

Concept one

 

[macjj]

As a 2012 Bighorn owner, my first vote is #1, 2nd vote is #4. #2 looks like it was made by RAM. #3 looks clean and a good concept for a toy hauler, but #4 sends a message. Just my nickel's worth


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[MTPockets]

Now I'm liking #4, but mountain needs to be bigger.

 

[kg_nc]

It doesn't matter too much to me about the graphics as long as they are not over done and are in cadence with the brand. I would like to see some functional improvements like an equilizer pipe between the two gray tanks so they fill evenly. Anyway, I've been very happy with my BH and look forward to real improvements that make me want a newer model.

 

[Kbvols]

I really like #4. Provides a nice clean look. The Brand is well identified and stands out. The peaks of the mountains highlight the BigHorn name as they are pointing out the Brand name.

 

[elwaller39]

I would vote for #4, but I would increase the size of the mountain abit.

 

[Shortest Straw]

Number 4 is a nice design compared to the others.

 

[TravelTiger]

Typeface from #3, but logo and colors of #4


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[ziggy]

I like the colors/contrast of the darker caps. I don't really like either of the first 2 but #2 is better than 1. I can go with either graphic from 3 and 4 but I kind of like 3.

Kristy

 

[JohnD]

#3 & #4 are OK . . . but the mountain, too me, just doesn't shout out 'Bighorn'!

At least #1 & #2 do that.

 

[Jesstruckn/Jesstalkn]

Now you all know what Tom, Andy and the others go through on a daily basis. It is impossible to please everybody.
But I think they are asking the right people for their feed back.
Thanks to Jim B. for creating this amazing avenue for all of us to give our input and hopefully make a difference in the future of the Heartland RV, inside and out.
Thanks


Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

 

[TomMontague]

Thanks to everyone who has responded. I really appreciate the feedback. I think between the 4 front caps designs we can come up with something that works. It's interesting to read all the different opinions and to hear what is and isn't important to folks.

Talk soon,
Tom


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[travelin2]

I originally voted for #2 but #4 is a nice alternative.
Exterior graphics are necessary to differentiate yourself from the next guy but my original buying emphasis was on quality construction and floor plan not exterior logos...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Alan_B]

Strong preference for #3 .

 

[Rangelady]

#1 I like the size of "BIGHORN" but would like to see "Heartland" bigger. When we were looking to buy a RV, we weren't familiar with the manufacturers and it was frustrating when we drove by one not being able to see who was manufacturing them.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

 

[Gaffer]

I don't care for #3 or#4. Need to keep the Ram. That's what a Bighorn is.

 

[WBG]

I don't care for # 3 or # 4 either. Neel to keep the Bighorn Logo!