OK folks, in bringing this topic to close on my part and stop beating the dead horse cause all its hair has gotta be worn off by now:
We love our 2008 Mount Rushmore Suites by Heartland. They built an absolutely beautiful and affordable Fiver in this unit.
But, we were not and are not happy to have learned it is physically two (2) physical years older than it actually was represented on the Title/Registration to us as being. Would we sell it just because of that? Heck no! Just means we now know the expenses of replacing the original rubber roof, graphics, etc. shall come sooner than later.
Do we feel that the dealer or original owner(s) misled us in any way regarding this Fiver and are responsible for repairing or replacing this unit? Heck no! Would we sell it just because of that? Heck no!
Are we unhappy and upset to have learned of the dark history of this unit with the axles, sidewalls, etc. having to be rebuilt? Heck yes! Would we sell it just because of that? Most likely not as long as we can feel it is a solid unit as it appears to be. Plus the silver lining in that ordeal is that we ended up with a Fiver with the top of the line axles and suspension MorRide IS (8000lbs rated) with hydraulic disc brakes rather than the flimsy 7000lb rated leaf spring axle assembly standard on this model. And the exterior fiberglass and graphics on both sidewalls is only four years old, not seven! NOTE: The slides are still original F & G.
Are we unhappy with whom ever did not deem this unit (in ours and our attorneys opinion) as "wrecked" or "Salvaged" on the title? Heck yes! Since these rig travel on the roads and highways and must be titled/registered/licensed as a motor vehicle, do they not fall under the same rules? When an axle failure causes the axles to come loose frame the frame, the frame is twisted, structural damage occurs, should it fall under black as being a wrecked unit, gray as being questionable, or white as being a normal safe vehicle? And who would have been responsible in notifying DMV on the change in status on the title/registration, the owner, insurer, or repair facility? I don't know. Do I feel it should have been classed as such? Yes!
Do I as a consumer realize that when purchasing a manufactured item I assume certain responsibilities on my part to maintain and repair such item at my expense above and beyond any implied warranties by the manufacturer? Heck yes! Do I agree with that statement when a repair is needed and the defect is (or may very well have been) caused by a manufacturers defect? Heck no! Am I going after the manufacturer in such a case? Yes! You've already seen that in this thread. Any smart consumer would if they feel the problem was not caused by normal wear and tear or neglect.
I truly wish I could post the photos of our unit when it was back at Heartland being all but completely rebuilt.[ At the request of the provider I can not and will not! ] I'm sure it would horrify many on this forum, as I'm sure if many of you had the opportunity to have seen them and heard the story behind them before purchasing the unit you would have said "Not no, heck no!" and walked away. We were not afforded that luxury until after the fact. Can we live with that and make the best of what's left of the unit? Yes
Do we see ourselves being the proud owners of this rig in the future? Yes! We get many a compliment on how beautiful it is inside and out at our park (Grand Lake RV and Golf Resort) and have been told more than once that we have one of the nicest looking Fivers in the resort. We invite any of you on the forum and whom have responded to or read this thread to stop by and see it for yourselves if in the neighborhood while we are at home. We'll leave the light on and make a pot of coffee for you, or a highball if you like!
Would I tell a perspective buyer to stay the heck away from Heartland's products if asked? NO! Would I share our experience with their product honestly and share the bitter/sweet side of our experience? YES! That is who we are, we sugar coat nothing, that is the right way of doing business and otherwise.